In this session, we will introduce students to guidance issued by Federal Agencies following Executive Order 14110 and considerations Federal Agencies are to consider when developing, procuring, and deploying Artificial Intelligence. We will examine cybersecurity and privacy considerations that permeate the procurement of Artificial Intelligence and areas of negotiation when procuring Artificial Intelligence. This session will also note potential further developments in the Federal Government's pursuit of Artificial Intelligence in following years. Learning Objectives: By the end of this session, students will be able to:  Identify the unique issues resident in procuring Artificial Intelligence  Areas of negotiation the Federal Government should consider when purchasing Artificial Intelligence  Cybersecurity and privacy issues that are areas of particular concern for Federal Agencies

In this session, participants will learn about the important aspects of Federal grant negotiation and compliance preparation. The session will cover key strategies for negotiating and managing grants, as well as best practices for preparing for the compliance burden associated with 2 CFR 200. Learning Objectives: By the end of this session, participants will be able to: 1. Understand the basics of Federal grant negotiation and compliance preparation, including the different types of grants and their requirements. 2. Develop effective strategies for negotiating with Federal agencies and ensuring compliance with grant terms and conditions. 3. Identify the common mistakes made during the grant negotiation and compliance preparation process and learn how to avoid them. 4. Gain insight into the tools and resources available to support successful grant management, such as budget tracking and reporting systems. 5. Understand the importance of effective communication and collaboration with grant partners, including Federal agencies and other stakeholders, to ensure successful grant implementation and compliance.

Our last session is on Subchapter H, Clauses and Forms. Clauses have been discussed in the eight previous sessions as they relate to the specific subject matter of that session. The final session is an overview of Part 52, the matrix, and alternate determinations. As a series end point, Part 53, the forms, and the problems that surround their appropriate use will be addressed. All parts of the FAR are not equal. But the FAR is the major document for the billion dollar plus yearly executive agency spend for supplies, services, and construction. The FAR answers many of the questions and sets out to meet the goal of uniform policies for executive agencies acquisitions paid for with appropriated funds. The FAR language seeks uniformity, fairness, trustworthiness, truth in negotiations and awards, availability to bid, and focuses on a system that protects the spend and encourages the best end-product available. These nine sessions have provided the overview of topics that are frequently taught in multi day classes, available in the classroom, and available virtually. What we spent half an hour on may well be available in a two-day class that is able to get "deep into the weeds" of compliance, implementation, enforcement of rules and regulations. Learning Objectives (After this webinar you will have learned) - How Flowdowns implement control. - How The matrix sets the stage. - How Documentation requires forms. - How Maintenance of documentation is mandatory. - How FAR manages spend and performance.

April 18, 1:00pm-2:00pm EDT Each year, Capital Edge works with numerous companies either developing, assisting with, or reviewing their final indirect cost rate proposals. The requirement to submit a final indirect cost rate proposal, more commonly referred to as the " Incurred Cost Proposal or Incurred Cost Submission (ICS) is contained in FAR clause 52.216-7(d)(2)(i) - Allowable Cost and Payment, which states, "The contractor shall submit an adequate final indirect cost rate proposal to the contracting officer (or cognizant federal agency official) and auditor within the 6-month period following the expiration of each of its fiscal years." For many contractors, the deadline for the next Incurred Cost Proposal is June 30th. Our experts recommend getting started soon, to be sure that you have adequate time to prepare the submission. Are you ready? Capital Edge has identified the major preparation pitfalls contractors face when developing their annual Incurred Cost Submission (ICS). Join Incurred Cost Submission expert, Chad Braley as he shares insight into some of the most common pitfalls. Presented by Chad Braley. Chad Braley is the Chief Executive Officer and Founder of Capital Edge Consulting, Inc. Since its inception, Capital Edge has grown into the country's leading firm, focusing solely on serving both foreign and domestic contractors who do business with the US Government. Chad's areas of expertise include the Cost Accounting Standards (CAS), Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), agency supplement regulations, Contractor Accounting, Purchasing, Estimating, MMAS, and EVM Business Systems, Truth in Negotiations Act, government accounting requirements Incurred Cost Submissions (ICS), DCAA Audits support and preparation, other regulatory non-compliance support, Terminations, Requests for Equitable Adjustment (REA), ERP systems and risk mitigation.

Subchapter C is the topic of the third session and addresses contracting methods and contract types. The parts of C are extremely important because the methodology and the determination of contractual type have a major impact on the contract itself and the contractual performance requirements. This session begins with the simplified acquisition purchase; moving then to sealed bidding and contracting by negotiation as two methods for awarding a contract. Part 16 is a mandatory read because it describes in detail the types of contracts and it forms the base for contractual performance. The FAR also identifies special types of contracts ad circumstances requiring emergency acquisitions. Contract Type plays a major role in the matrix of Part 52 in identifying mandatory, mandatory if applicable, and optional flowdowns. Learning Objectives (After this webinar you will have learned) - How awarding money requires evaluation. - How evaluation is based on procurement methods. - How contract types influence method and award. - How special needs exist.

Contrasts In Accounting - Navigating the Differences February 6, 11:30-1:00 EST This is the first webinar in our four-part webinar series titled "First Year Government Contract Accounting- Building Blocks" As a cost-based Government contractor, the use of full absorption accounting is required. While Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) serves as our foundation for contract accounting and is a requirement for an "adequate" accounting system, FAR Part 31, contract cost principles and procedures and Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) layer additional requirements upon a Government contractor's accounting system. This webinar will introduce some of the key differences between Government contract cost accounting and financial accounting; explain some reasoning behind the divergence in accounting practices; and establish the foundation for this 4 part webinar series. Learning Objectives: By the end of this session, participants will be able to identify key differences between US GAAP accounting and Government contract accounting; Understand the reasoning for the divergence in accounting; Become familiar with full absorption accounting; and become familiar with the accounting implications of cost-based acquisition and FAR Part 15, Contracting by negotiation. NOTE: CPE/CLE credit for attendees is subject to participation and approval by the governing boards. Series Description: There is accounting and then there is Government contract accounting. Government contract accounting imposes unique pricing, accounting and compliance requirements on Government contractors. And, unlike Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), requires full absorption accounting. If you are new to Government contracting or want to understand more about the unique accounting requirements this four part webinar series will introduce critical accounting fundamentals.

In this session we will cover multiple ways the DoD makes their award decisions. The key methodologies of Sealing Bidding as well as Competitive Negotiations (or competitive proposals) will be discussed with an emphasis on the Source Selection Process used by the DoD. A key component of the DoD award decision is the "responsibility determination." Understanding how this final Contracting Officer determination can literally derail an otherwise successful proposal is critical. Learning Objectives: The selection process will be discussed as well as using debriefings to better understand just "why" you weren't successful. Lastly, when all else fails, if the DoD didn't fairly and transparently execute their procurement process, the protest process will be extensively covered to prepare you to challenge a DoD award decision.